Biosolids Facility Triple Bottom Line Benefits
Nashville Metro Water Services makes sustainability a priority at its five facilities. Wilmot was tasked with measuring the impact of those improvements at the Central Wastewater Treatment Plant and identified $493M in community benefits.
Overview
For years, heavy truck traffic and pervasive odors from raw sewage sludge plagued the Germantown and Salemtown neighborhoods in Nashville. As part of an upgrade program at the Central Wastewater Treatment Plant, Nashville Metro Water Services invested $136M in a new Biosolids Facility. Prior to construction of the Biosolids Facility, raw, dewatered sewage sludge was hauled long distances to a landfill. At times, there was no landfill that would accept the sludge, causing backups, odors, and increased liability. There were also numerous issues community-wide with odors and truck traffic. Although the decision to build a Biosolids Facility did not offer the lowest capital cost of all options, the plant has and will continue to save millions of dollars over its lifetime by generating extremely desirable economic, social and environmental improvements. The new facility digests and dries sewage sludge and processes it into Class A biosolid pellets, used as soil amendment for agricultural, erosion control, lawns, etc.
Wilmot’s Role
To assess the impact of the investment on Nashville, Wilmot completed a triple bottom line analysis to evaluate the economic, social and environmental impacts of the new facility. Wilmot found $493M in benefits, including:
Avoided costs from emissions of greenhouse gases and criteria air pollutants
O&M savings
Sludge disposal savings
Pellet revenue
Savings to the agricultural industry
Avoided liability
Increased property values
Nitrogen runoff mitigation
Future benefits from biogas reuse
Results
$493M triple bottom line benefits over 20 years
Benefit-cost ratio of 1.77
QUICK FACTS:
Client:
Metro Water Services
Location:
Nashville, TN
Markets:
Municipal
Water/wastewater
Services:
Triple bottom line cost benefit analysis
Economic impact analysis
Geospatial analysis
Greenhouse gas inventory